swaziland: is developed country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.47
, location
Weight: 0.44
, south africa
Weight: 0.42
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, central american country
Weight: 0.28
, czech republic
Weight: 0.28
, west germany
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed country 1.00
is developed 0.91
is less developed 0.85
is country 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(swaziland, is developed country)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(swaziland, is country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is less developed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(swaziland, is less developed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is less developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(swaziland, is less developed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is developed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(swaziland, is country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(swaziland, is developed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(swaziland, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)