south africa: is developed

Related concepts

Parents	south korea Weight: 0.81 , africa Weight: 0.80 , south america Weight: 0.78 , latin america Weight: 0.73
Siblings	new zealand Weight: 0.69 , australia Weight: 0.66 , germany Weight: 0.65 , france Weight: 0.64 , south Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is developed	1.00
is more developed	0.95
is less developed	0.90
be regarded as developing country	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(south america, is less developed)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(south america, is developed)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(south america, is developed)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(france, is developed)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(australia, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(australia, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(australia, is developed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(france, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(france, is developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(south africa, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(south africa, is less developed)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is more developed)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(south africa, is more developed)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(south africa, is more developed)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(south africa, is more developed)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(south america, is developed)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(france, is developed)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(australia, is developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(south america, is developed)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(south africa, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)