switch: be preferable to hub in ethernet network

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light switch
Weight: 0.82
, feature
Weight: 0.65
, network device
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, combination
Weight: 0.59
Siblings toggle
Weight: 0.48
, computer network
Weight: 0.33
, screen saver
Weight: 0.32
, use computer
Weight: 0.32
, introduction
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferable to hub in ethernet network 1.00
be faster than hub 0.81
be more secure than hubs 0.81
be called intelligent hub 0.81
be better than hubs 0.80
be needed in network 0.80
is gateway 0.80
be faster than routers 0.79
maximize overall network bandwidth 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(network device, is gateway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(network device, is gateway)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(network device, is gateway)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(network device, is gateway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(switch, be more secure than hubs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(switch, be called intelligent hub)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(switch, be better than hubs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(switch, be faster than hub)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(switch, be faster than routers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(switch, be needed in network)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(switch, be more secure than hubs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(switch, maximize overall network bandwidth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(switch, be more secure than hubs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(switch, be called intelligent hub)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(switch, be called intelligent hub)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(switch, be faster than hub)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(switch, be better than hubs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(switch, be better than hubs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(switch, be needed in network)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(switch, be faster than hub)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(switch, be faster than routers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(switch, be faster than routers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(switch, be needed in network)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(switch, maximize overall network bandwidth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(switch, maximize overall network bandwidth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(switch, be needed in network)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(switch, be faster than hub)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(switch, be more secure than hubs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(switch, be better than hubs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(switch, be called intelligent hub)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(switch, be faster than routers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(switch, maximize overall network bandwidth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(network device, is gateway)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(switch, be preferable to hub in ethernet network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(network device, is gateway)