symphony: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents classical music
Weight: 0.65
, piece
Weight: 0.61
, composition
Weight: 0.59
, form
Weight: 0.58
, work
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chamber music
Weight: 0.36
, opera
Weight: 0.36
, cello
Weight: 0.34
, country music
Weight: 0.34
, classical
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality right 0.90
has quality worth 0.85
be good on dxm 0.84
is great 0.81
has quality worst 0.80
is bad now 0.78
is good thing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(classical music, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(piece, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(classical music, is great)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(classical music, be good on dxm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(piece, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(classical music, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(piece, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is great)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(country music, is bad now)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(opera, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(country music, is great)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(piece, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(classical music, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(classical music, is great)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(classical music, be good on dxm)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(symphony, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(opera, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(opera, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(country music, is great)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is great)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(country music, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(country music, is bad now)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality worst)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(symphony, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(piece, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality better)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(country music, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(country music, is bad now)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opera, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is great)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(piece, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is great)