table: be at in dine room

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.59
, stage
Weight: 0.59
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, sofa
Weight: 0.61
, hand
Weight: 0.60
, roulette
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in dine room 1.00
be at dine room 1.00
be used to dine 0.94
be scatter throughout restaurant dine area 0.83
be at live room 0.83
be at in live room 0.83
be find in live room 0.82
be at dinner 0.82
be at person live room 0.82
be at in room 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(table, be at in dine room)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(table, be at in dine room)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(food, be at dine room)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(food, be at dinner)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dinner)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(coffee table, be find in live room)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sofa, be at person live room)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sofa, be at in live room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(table, be at in dine room)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(table, be at in dine room)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sofa, be at in live room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sofa, be at in live room)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(sofa, be at person live room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sofa, be at person live room)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(coffee table, be find in live room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(coffee table, be find in live room)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(table, be at in dine room)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to dine)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(table, be at live room)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in live room)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(table, be used to dine)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(table, be at live room)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(table, be at in live room)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(table, be used to dine)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in room)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(table, be at in live room)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(table, be at in room)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(table, be at live room)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(table, be used to dine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(table, be at in room)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(table, be at in room)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(table, be at in live room)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(table, be at live room)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(table, be at in dine room)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sofa, be at in live room)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sofa, be at person live room)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coffee table, be find in live room)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(table, be at in dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)