table: be scatter throughout restaurant dine area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.59
, stage
Weight: 0.59
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, sofa
Weight: 0.61
, hand
Weight: 0.60
, roulette
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be scatter throughout restaurant dine area 1.00
be at in dine room 0.83
be used to dine 0.83
be at dine room 0.82
be find in restaurant 0.81
be defined as place you eat in restaurant 0.81
be at in restaurant 0.79
be serve in restaurant 0.79
be serve at restaurant 0.78
be at fast-food restaurant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(food, be at dine room)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to dine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(table, be at in dine room)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(table, be defined as place you eat in restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(table, be at in restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(table, be used to dine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(table, be used to dine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(table, be defined as place you eat in restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(table, be at in dine room)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(table, be at in restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(table, be defined as place you eat in restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(table, be used to dine)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(table, be at in dine room)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(table, be defined as place you eat in restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(table, be at in restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(table, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(table, be scatter throughout restaurant dine area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)