table: be used to dinner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.59
, stage
Weight: 0.59
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, sofa
Weight: 0.61
, hand
Weight: 0.60
, roulette
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to dinner 1.00
be at dinner 0.99
be make into dinner 0.89
be used to eat meal 0.83
be used to dine 0.82
be at dine room 0.81
be at in dine room 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(table, be used to dinner)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(table, be used to dinner)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(food, be at dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(food, be at dine room)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dinner)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(table, be used to dinner)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(table, be used to dinner)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(table, be used to dinner)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(table, be used to eat meal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(table, be at in dine room)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(table, be used to dine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(table, be used to dine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(table, be used to dine)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(table, be at in dine room)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(table, be used to eat meal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(table, be used to eat meal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to dine)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(table, be at in dine room)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to eat meal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in dine room)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(table, be used to dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(table, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)