tablet: be better than capsules

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than capsules 1.00
be more expensive than capsules 0.97
be in capsules 0.96
be better than tablets 0.80
be more expensive than tablets 0.79
cost more than tablets 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tablet, be better than capsules)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be in capsules)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tablet, be in capsules)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(tablet, be more expensive than capsules)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tablet, be in capsules)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tablet, be in capsules)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive than capsules)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than capsules)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)