target: close in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
close in canada 1.00
be illegal in canada 0.87
be banned in canada 0.84
promote change in canada 0.84
be in australia 0.83
be better than walmart 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, close in canada)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, close in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, promote change in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(head, be in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(target, close in canada)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(target, close in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(head, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(head, be in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(target, close in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be banned in canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(target, be banned in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(target, be banned in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be better than walmart)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(target, be better than walmart)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(target, be better than walmart)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(target, be banned in canada)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be better than walmart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(target, close in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, close in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(option, be illegal in canada)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(head, be in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(option, be illegal in canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(target, close in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)