team: have better sports

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football team
Weight: 0.77
, baseball team
Weight: 0.66
, professional
Weight: 0.65
, squad
Weight: 0.62
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, new jersey
Weight: 0.71
, staff
Weight: 0.70
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.68
, league
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have better sports 1.00
have sports 0.94
be in sports 0.93
be bad at soccer 0.80
is sport 0.80
improve in soccer 0.79
has quality better 0.78
be used in athletics 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(league, has quality better)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse, is sport)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(league, is sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(league, is sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(league, is sport)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(lacrosse, is sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lacrosse, is sport)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(league, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(league, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(team, have better sports)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(team, have sports)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(team, be in sports)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(team, have sports)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(team, be in sports)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, have sports)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(team, have sports)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(team, be in sports)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, be in sports)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(team, is sport)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(team, improve in soccer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(team, be bad at soccer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(team, is sport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(team, is sport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(team, improve in soccer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(team, be bad at soccer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(team, is sport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(team, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(team, be used in athletics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(team, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(team, be used in athletics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(team, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(team, improve in soccer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(team, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(team, be bad at soccer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(team, be used in athletics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(team, be used in athletics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(team, improve in soccer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(team, be bad at soccer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(team, have better sports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(league, is sport)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lacrosse, is sport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(team, have better sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(league, has quality better)