telephone: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular telephone
Weight: 0.76
, telephone system
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.61
, utility
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, pager
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
has quality good 0.81
is good thing 0.81
is great invention 0.80
is big 0.80
is terrible 0.79
is big now 0.79
is difficult really 0.78
be bad for us 0.78
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(telephone, is great)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(telephone, is great)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(network, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(telephone, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(network, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(network, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(network, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be good for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(telephone, is great)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(telephone, is great)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(network, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(telephone, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mobile phone, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cellphone, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(telephone, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(telephone, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(telephone, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(telephone, is great invention)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(telephone, is great invention)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(telephone, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(telephone, is great invention)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great invention)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(telephone, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(telephone, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(network, is good thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(network, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cellphone, be good for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(network, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(network, is good thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(telephone, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)