pager: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.61
, cell phone
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.36
, network device
Weight: 0.35
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
improve quality for people 0.84
improve quality for people today 0.83
be good for environment 0.80
is good thing 0.78
be bad in bulgaria 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
be good for school 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cell phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(cell phone, be good for school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cell phone, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cell phone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be good for school)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be good for school)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, improve quality for people today)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, improve quality for people)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be good for school)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cell phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(cell phone, be good for school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cell phone, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cell phone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pager, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cellphone, improve quality for people today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cellphone, improve quality for people today)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cellphone, improve quality for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cellphone, improve quality for people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cellphone, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be good for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cellphone, be good for school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be good for school)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pager, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pager, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cell phone, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for environment)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cellphone, improve quality for people today)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cellphone, be good for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cellphone, improve quality for people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cellphone, be good for school)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cell phone, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(pager, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for school)