textbook: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.61
, example
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bible
Weight: 0.63
, math book
Weight: 0.61
, cheque book
Weight: 0.33
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, dissertation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality resource 0.79
has quality question 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
has quality questions 0.76
be made better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality question)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality question)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality definition)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality questions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(textbook, be made better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, be made better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality questions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality definition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality question)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(textbook, be made better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality definition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality definition)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality questions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality question)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(textbook, be made better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality good)