textbook: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.61
, example
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bible
Weight: 0.63
, math book
Weight: 0.61
, cheque book
Weight: 0.33
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, dissertation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is good resource 0.93
has quality good 0.79
has quality better 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(science fiction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(science fiction, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(textbook, is good resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(textbook, is good resource)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(textbook, is good resource)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(textbook, is good resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(textbook, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(textbook, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(textbook, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(textbook, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(science fiction, has quality good)