tlc: be useful technique in chemistry

Related concepts

Parents	channel Weight: 0.62 , network Weight: 0.61 , brand Weight: 0.56 , tv show Weight: 0.56 , group Weight: 0.55
Siblings	kate Weight: 0.34 , spongebob squarepants Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33 , simpsons Weight: 0.33 , computer network Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be useful technique in chemistry	1.00
be used in chemistry	0.88
be used in organic chemistry	0.83
be poor technique for analysis	0.83
be poor technique for analysis of liquids	0.82
be poor technique for analysis of low liquids	0.80
be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids	0.80
be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids	0.79
is useful	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(network, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(network, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(computer network, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(network, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(computer network, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(computer network, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(tlc, be used in chemistry)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(tlc, be used in chemistry)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(tlc, be used in chemistry)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(tlc, be used in organic chemistry)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(tlc, be used in organic chemistry)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(tlc, be used in organic chemistry)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low liquids)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of liquids)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of liquids)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low liquids)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low liquids)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(tlc, is useful)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of liquids)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be used in organic chemistry)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of liquids)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low liquids)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(tlc, is useful)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(tlc, is useful)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be used in chemistry)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(tlc, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(network, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(computer network, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(network, is useful)