tofu: be better than chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, cheese
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soy sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35
, chicken
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than chicken 1.00
be more expensive than meat 0.85
taste like meat 0.80
be more expensive than animal 0.77
be more expensive than dead animal 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tofu, be better than chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, taste like meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(tofu, taste like meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(tofu, taste like meat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tofu, taste like meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)