tofu: be more expensive than animal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, cheese
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soy sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35
, chicken
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than animal 1.00
be more expensive than dead animal 0.95
be more expensive than meat 0.88
is expensive 0.80
be better than chicken 0.77
be bad for dogs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(soy sauce, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tofu, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tofu, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tofu, be better than chicken)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tofu, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tofu, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soy sauce, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)