tofu: be more expensive than meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, cheese
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soy sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35
, chicken
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than meat 1.00
be more expensive than animal 0.88
be better than chicken 0.85
be more expensive than dead animal 0.84
taste like meat 0.84
is expensive 0.79
be cheaper than soybeans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(soy sauce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be cheaper than soybeans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(tofu, be cheaper than soybeans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tofu, be cheaper than soybeans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tofu, be better than chicken)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, taste like meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tofu, be cheaper than soybeans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tofu, be better than chicken)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(tofu, taste like meat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(tofu, taste like meat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tofu, taste like meat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tofu, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be better than chicken)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tofu, be better than chicken)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tofu, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tofu, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tofu, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soy sauce, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tofu, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)