toothbrush: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, household appliance
Weight: 0.57
Siblings disposable razor
Weight: 0.36
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.35
, dental floss
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(disposable razor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(disposable razor, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dental floss, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dental floss, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dental floss, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(razor blade, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(disposable razor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(disposable razor, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(disposable razor, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(disposable razor, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(toothbrush, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(toothbrush, is best)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(toothbrush, is best)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, is best)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dental floss, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(disposable razor, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(disposable razor, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(razor blade, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality better)