toothbrush: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, household appliance
Weight: 0.57
Siblings disposable razor
Weight: 0.36
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.35
, dental floss
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better making 0.81
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.77
is best 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(instrument, be better making)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(disposable razor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dental floss, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dental floss, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dental floss, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(razor blade, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(disposable razor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(disposable razor, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(toothbrush, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(toothbrush, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(toothbrush, is best)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dental floss, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(disposable razor, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(razor blade, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)