toothbrush: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, household appliance
Weight: 0.57
Siblings disposable razor
Weight: 0.36
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.35
, dental floss
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for game 0.78
go bad 0.77
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(disposable razor, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(disposable razor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dental floss, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(disposable razor, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(disposable razor, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(razor blade, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dental floss, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dental floss, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(disposable razor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(disposable razor, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(razor blade, go bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(razor blade, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(toothbrush, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(disposable razor, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(razor blade, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(disposable razor, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(razor blade, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dental floss, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(toothbrush, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality good)