transparency: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents principle
Weight: 0.68
, value
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.37
, openness
Weight: 0.37
, honesty
Weight: 0.36
, integrity
Weight: 0.35
, freedom
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
is quality 0.87
be be bad 0.86
is important quality 0.85
has quality worth 0.82
be good quality in leader 0.81
be good value have 0.80
is most important quality 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(freedom, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(freedom, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(freedom, be be bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good value have)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is most important quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(freedom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(freedom, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(integrity, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(freedom, be be bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(freedom, be be bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(honesty, be good value have)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good value have)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(freedom, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(freedom, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(honesty, is important quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(honesty, is most important quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(honesty, is most important quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good quality in leader)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(transparency, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(transparency, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(transparency, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(transparency, has quality worth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(transparency, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(freedom, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(integrity, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(freedom, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(freedom, be be bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honesty, is important quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(honesty, be good value have)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(honesty, is most important quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(transparency, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)