uber: be banned in philippines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in philippines 1.00
be banned in spain 0.83
be banned in japan 0.83
be banned in germany 0.82
be banned from california 0.82
be banned in oregon 0.81
be banned in london 0.81
be banned from london 0.81
be banned in vancouver 0.80
be banned from pvp 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in philippines)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in germany)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in london)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in oregon)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in germany)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in london)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in london)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in oregon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in germany)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in london)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in oregon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in oregon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in philippines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(uber, be banned in philippines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in philippines)