unemployment: decrease in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
decrease in australia 1.00
rise in australia 0.92
decrease in uk 0.91
be high in australia 0.89
affect people in australia 0.89
happen in australia 0.88
be problem in australia 0.88
increase in uk 0.87
exist in australia 0.87
decrease in nepal 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(poverty, increase in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(unemployment, decrease in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(unemployment, rise in australia)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(unemployment, rise in australia)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, rise in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(unemployment, rise in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(unemployment, decrease in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(poverty, affect people in australia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in australia)