union: be much stronger in canada

Related concepts

Parents	city Weight: 0.61 , club Weight: 0.61 , county Weight: 0.59 , institution Weight: 0.59 , party Weight: 0.59
Siblings	labor Weight: 0.34 , quebec city Weight: 0.33 , political party Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be much stronger in canada	1.00
be important in canada	0.89
decline in canada	0.83
be better than washington	0.79
be good for america	0.77
be needed in america	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(union, be much stronger in canada)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(union, be much stronger in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(party, be good for america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(political party, be important in canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(political party, be important in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(political party, be important in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(union, be much stronger in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(union, be important in canada)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(union, decline in canada)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(union, decline in canada)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(union, decline in canada)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(union, be better than washington)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(union, decline in canada)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(union, be important in canada)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(union, be important in canada)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(union, be needed in america)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(union, be good for america)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(union, be better than washington)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(union, be important in canada)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(union, be needed in america)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(union, be better than washington)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(union, be good for america)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(union, be needed in america)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(union, be good for america)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(union, be better than washington)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(union, be good for america)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(union, be needed in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(union, be much stronger in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(party, be good for america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(political party, be important in canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(union, be much stronger in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(party, be good for america)