utah: be called state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.60
, team
Weight: 0.60
, program
Weight: 0.57
, school
Weight: 0.57
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.35
, denver
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called state 1.00
has state state 0.89
be known as state 0.82
be called dixie state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(utah, be called state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(college, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(college, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be known as state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(utah, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(alabama, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(alabama, be known as state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(utah, be called state)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(utah, has state state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(utah, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(utah, be known as state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called dixie state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(utah, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(utah, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(utah, be known as state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(utah, be known as state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(utah, be known as state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(utah, be called dixie state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(utah, be called dixie state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(utah, be called dixie state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(utah, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be known as state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(utah, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)