valley: be at mountainous region

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.62
, tree
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings rift valley
Weight: 0.74
, stream
Weight: 0.56
, death valley
Weight: 0.37
, greenwich village
Weight: 0.34
, town
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at mountainous region 1.00
be at mountainous area 0.96
be at mountainous state 0.95
be at hilly area 0.81
be at in mountain 0.80
be at mountain 0.79
be at valley 0.79
be defined as area between two mountain 0.77
be at rural area 0.76
be at top of mountain 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(river, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tree, be at in mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tree, be at top of mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(river, be at mountainous area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in mountain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at mountain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(river, be at valley)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tree, be at top of mountain)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(river, be at mountainous area)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at mountain)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at top of mountain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in mountain)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(town, be at valley)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(river, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tree, be at in mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tree, be at top of mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(town, be at valley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(town, be at valley)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(town, be at rural area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(valley, be at mountainous region)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(valley, be at mountainous state)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous state)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous state)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(valley, be at mountainous area)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(river, be at mountainous area)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in mountain)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tree, be at mountain)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tree, be at top of mountain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(town, be at valley)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(river, be at mountainous area)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in mountain)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tree, be at mountain)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(valley, be at mountainous region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tree, be at top of mountain)