velcro: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.60
, strap
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, attachment
Weight: 0.53
, method
Weight: 0.51
Siblings adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, stylus
Weight: 0.34
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.33
, joystick
Weight: 0.33
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
go bad 0.77
has quality good 0.77
act bad 0.76
be said to cycle through ecosystem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(velcro, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(velcro, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(attachment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(velcro, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(velcro, be bad for environment)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(method, act bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(velcro, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(method, act bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(attachment, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(method, act bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(attachment, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(floppy disk, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(attachment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(method, act bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(floppy disk, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(floppy disk, go bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(velcro, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(velcro, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(velcro, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(velcro, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(velcro, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(velcro, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(velcro, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(velcro, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(velcro, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(velcro, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, act bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(attachment, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(floppy disk, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, act bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(attachment, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(material, be said to cycle through ecosystem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(velcro, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)