vinyl: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
is best quality 0.93
is best sound quality 0.83
is better quality 0.78
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.76
be considered better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(acetate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(acetate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(acetate, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(acetate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality good)