walnut: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be poisonous to dogs 0.85
be toxic to dogs 0.84
be bad for birds 0.80
affect rabbits 0.78
go bad 0.77
kill horses 0.76
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oak, be bad for birds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oak, be bad for birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(oak, be bad for birds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(walnut, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(walnut, be poisonous to dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be poisonous to dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(walnut, be poisonous to dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be toxic to dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(walnut, be toxic to dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(walnut, be toxic to dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(walnut, kill horses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(walnut, kill horses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(walnut, kill horses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(walnut, be poisonous to dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(walnut, be toxic to dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(walnut, kill horses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(walnut, go bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(walnut, go bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(walnut, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(walnut, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(oak, be bad for birds)