walnut: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
go grey 0.87
go mouldy 0.87
cut bad 0.82
be good for us 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
taste bad 0.79
match times bad right now 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
be bad for dogs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wood, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(wood, go grey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wood, go grey)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wood, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wood, go grey)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(wood, go grey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(walnut, go bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wood, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(walnut, go bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(walnut, go bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(walnut, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oak tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(walnut, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be bad for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(walnut, be bad for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(walnut, be bad for dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(walnut, be bad for dogs)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wood, go grey)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oak tree, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wood, go grey)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(walnut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)