walnut: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
has quality use 0.86
has quality change 0.86
taste bad 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
go bad 0.79
is poor cunductor 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hardwood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wood, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(wood, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wood, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wood, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(oak, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hardwood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wood, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oak tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mahogany, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(oak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(oak, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(walnut, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(walnut, go bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(walnut, go bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(walnut, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oak tree, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mahogany, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(oak, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(walnut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)