waste: is global problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is global problem 1.00
problem for world 0.91
is global issue 0.91
has state problem 0.84
problem for entire world 0.84
is environmental problem 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waste, is global problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(action, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waste, is global problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(action, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(action, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(trash, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trash, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waste, is global problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(action, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waste, is global problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(trash, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(trash, is global issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trash, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trash, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(waste, is global problem)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(waste, is global issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(waste, is global issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(waste, is global issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(waste, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(waste, is environmental problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(waste, problem for world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(waste, is environmental problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(waste, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(waste, is environmental problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(waste, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(waste, problem for entire world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for entire world)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is environmental problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(waste, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for entire world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(waste, problem for entire world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waste, is global problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(action, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(landfill, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(trash, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trash, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(action, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(waste, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)