water heater: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hot water
Weight: 0.80
, household appliance
Weight: 0.71
, heating
Weight: 0.70
, plumbing
Weight: 0.70
Siblings electric heater
Weight: 0.41
, dryer
Weight: 0.37
, heat sink
Weight: 0.37
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.37
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is quality 0.89
has quality change 0.86
be better than water 0.83
be with good 0.79
be better looking than water 0.79
feel better than cold water 0.77
be better than cold water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(hot water, be better than cold water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heating, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(hot water, be better than cold water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hot water, be better than cold water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dryer, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(hot water, be better than cold water)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dryer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dryer, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electric heater, is quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(water heater, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is quality)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(water heater, is quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hot water, be better than cold water)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(heating, has quality change)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dryer, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electric heater, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(heating, has quality change)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(water heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hot water, be better than cold water)