electric heater: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heating
Weight: 0.78
, thermostat
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
Siblings water heater
Weight: 0.41
, electric motor
Weight: 0.37
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.36
, heat pump
Weight: 0.36
, furnace
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality better 0.89
has quality bad 0.87
has quality change 0.84
has quality prices 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electric heater, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electric heater, is quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electric heater, is quality)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electric heater, is quality)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(thermostat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electric heater, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(thermostat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heating, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heater, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, has quality prices)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(thermostat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(water heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(heat pump, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(heat pump, has quality prices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(electric heater, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electric heater, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(thermostat, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(heating, has quality change)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heater, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heater, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(heat pump, has quality prices)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heater, is quality)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(thermostat, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heater, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(electric heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(heating, has quality change)