webcam: is ridiculously overpriced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, video
Weight: 0.58
, digital camera
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, application
Weight: 0.55
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, projector
Weight: 0.36
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ridiculously overpriced 1.00
is overpriced 0.94
is expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(projector, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(projector, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(webcam, is overpriced)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(webcam, is overpriced)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(webcam, is overpriced)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(webcam, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is overpriced)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(projector, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(webcam, is ridiculously overpriced) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)