wildfire: be bad in bc

Related concepts

Parents	event Weight: 0.62 , fire Weight: 0.59 , crisis Weight: 0.58 , situation Weight: 0.55 , emergency Weight: 0.55
Siblings	fire extinguisher Weight: 0.35 , fire department Weight: 0.35 , fire alarm Weight: 0.35 , fire hose Weight: 0.34 , fire brigade Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad in bc	1.00
be in bc	0.97
get worse bc	0.95
be in california bad	0.76
be bad in california	0.76
be in greece	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(fire, be bad in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(situation, be in greece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(situation, be in greece)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(fire, be bad in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(situation, be in greece)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(fire, be bad in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(situation, be in greece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(wildfire, be bad in bc)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(wildfire, be in bc)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(wildfire, be in bc)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be in bc)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(wildfire, be in bc)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad in california)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(wildfire, be bad in california)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in california)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be in greece)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(wildfire, be in greece)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(wildfire, be in greece)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in california)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(wildfire, be in greece)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(situation, be in greece)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(fire, be bad in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(situation, be in greece)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(fire, be bad in california)