wine: be serve at fancy meal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be serve at fancy meal 1.00
be serve in fancy restaurant 0.92
be serve with meal 0.91
be serve at elegant dinner 0.86
be at fancy restaurant 0.86
be a part of meal 0.84
be good for romantic dinner 0.80
be serve hot 0.79
be at dinner 0.78
be tasty 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(drink, be a part of meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drink, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(drink, be at dinner)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(drink, be a part of meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(drink, be a part of meal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at dinner)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(drink, be a part of meal)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(drink, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wine, be serve with meal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wine, be good for romantic dinner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wine, be tasty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(wine, be good for romantic dinner)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(wine, be serve hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wine, be good for romantic dinner)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine, be serve hot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve with meal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(wine, be tasty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wine, be good for romantic dinner)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(wine, be tasty)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wine, be tasty)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wine, be serve with meal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve with meal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(drink, be a part of meal)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(drink, be at dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(drink, be a part of meal)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(drink, be at dinner)