wine cellar: be at fancy restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wine
Weight: 0.67
, room
Weight: 0.67
, restaurant
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
, location
Weight: 0.53
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.39
, cellar
Weight: 0.38
, grape juice
Weight: 0.36
, madeira
Weight: 0.36
, laundry room
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fancy restaurant 1.00
be serve in fancy restaurant 0.94
be at good restaurant 0.87
be at restaurant 0.86
be serve at fancy meal 0.86
be at resturant 0.79
be serve at elegant dinner 0.77
be good for romantic dinner 0.76
be at at hotel 0.76
has waiter 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(wine, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(restaurant, has waiter)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wine, be good for romantic dinner)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(room, be at at hotel)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wine, be good for romantic dinner)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(room, be at at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wine, be at resturant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has waiter)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wine, be good for romantic dinner)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at resturant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(room, be at at hotel)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has waiter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(wine, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(restaurant, has waiter)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wine, be good for romantic dinner)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(room, be at at hotel)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine, be at resturant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(restaurant, has waiter)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(room, be at at hotel)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wine, be good for romantic dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine, be at resturant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(restaurant, has waiter)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(room, be at at hotel)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wine, be good for romantic dinner)