wine: be serve in fancy restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be serve in fancy restaurant 1.00
be at fancy restaurant 0.94
be serve at fancy meal 0.92
be at good restaurant 0.84
be at restaurant 0.83
be serve at elegant dinner 0.83
be serve with meal 0.81
be serve hot 0.78
be serve in saloon 0.77
be serve on airplane 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(alcoholic beverage, be serve in saloon)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(alcoholic beverage, be serve in saloon)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(alcoholic beverage, be serve in saloon)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(alcoholic beverage, be serve in saloon)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wine, be serve with meal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve on airplane)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wine, be serve on airplane)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve hot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve on airplane)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve hot)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at elegant dinner)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(wine, be serve hot)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine, be serve hot)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wine, be serve on airplane)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve with meal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve with meal)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wine, be serve with meal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(alcoholic beverage, be serve in saloon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(alcoholic beverage, be serve in saloon)