woodpecker: have short strong fan tail feathers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chickadee
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have short strong fan tail feathers 1.00
have long beak 0.79
have strong pointed beak 0.78
need strong beaks 0.78
has physical part beak 0.76
have long beaks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)