writing: be in art of ancient egyptians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in art of ancient egyptians 1.00
was important in ancient civilization 0.88
was used in ancient egypt 0.86
was important to ancient china 0.86
was important to ancient civilizations 0.85
was invented in ancient civilizations 0.85
was os important in ancient civilizations 0.84
was first developed in ancient mesopotamia 0.82
was intended in ancient civilizations 0.81
was important in civilization 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important to ancient china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was important to ancient china)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)