writing: was used in ancient egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was used in ancient egypt 1.00
was os important in ancient civilizations 0.87
be in art of ancient egyptians 0.86
was important to ancient china 0.85
was important in ancient civilization 0.85
was invented in ancient civilizations 0.85
was important to ancient civilizations 0.84
was intended in ancient civilizations 0.83
was first developed in ancient mesopotamia 0.82
was os important in civilizations 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important to ancient china)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was important to ancient china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)