writing: was important to ancient china

Property	Similarity
was important to ancient china	1.00
was important in ancient civilization	0.86
be in art of ancient egyptians	0.86
was used in ancient egypt	0.85
was important to ancient civilizations	0.85
was os important in ancient civilizations	0.83
was first developed in ancient mesopotamia	0.82
was invented in ancient civilizations	0.82
was intended in ancient civilizations	0.80
was important in civilization	0.77

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(writing, was used in ancient egypt)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(writing, was used in ancient egypt)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(writing, was used in ancient egypt)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(writing, was first developed in ancient mesopotamia)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(writing, was used in ancient egypt)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(writing, be in art of ancient egyptians)

Parents	subject Weight: 0.60 , work Weight: 0.59 , matter Weight: 0.58 , quality Weight: 0.56 , production Weight: 0.56
Siblings	entry Weight: 0.56 , reading Weight: 0.35 , write Weight: 0.34 , read Weight: 0.33 , grammar Weight: 0.32

writing: was important to ancient china

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible