zoo: be safe for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be safe for animals 1.00
be good for animals 0.90
be important for animals 0.89
be bad for animals 0.87
be good for endangered animals 0.86
be good places for animals 0.86
keep animals 0.86
be bad to animals 0.86
be bad animals live in 0.85
kill healthy animals 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(zoo, be safe for animals)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(zoo, kill healthy animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(zoo, kill healthy animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zoo, be safe for animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be safe for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)