academic: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
Siblings financial institution
Weight: 0.35
, secondary school
Weight: 0.34
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, institute
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is great 0.81
has quality honesty 0.79
affect water quality 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
has quality rights 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
improve performance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(academic, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(academic, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(academic, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(individual, has quality rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(academic, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(individual, has quality rights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(individual, has quality rights)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality evil)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(academic, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(academic, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(academic, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(individual, has quality rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(academic, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(institute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(educational system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(educational system, has quality definition)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(institute, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(academic, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(academic, has quality honesty)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(academic, has quality honesty)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(academic, has quality honesty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(academic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(individual, has quality rights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(educational system, has quality definition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(institute, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(institute, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(individual, has quality rights)