animation: is career

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is career 1.00
is good career 0.97
is career choice 0.91
is good career choice 0.90
is career option 0.89
is good career option 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, is career)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, is career)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(design, is career choice)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, is career)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, is good career choice)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, is career)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(design, is career)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(design, is good career)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(design, is career choice)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, is good career choice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design, is career)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(design, is career choice)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career choice)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(photography, is good career)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(animation, is career)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(animation, is career)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(design, is career choice)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(animation, is career)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, is good career choice)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(animation, is career)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(photography, is good career)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(photography, is good career)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(animation, is career)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(animation, is good career)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(animation, is good career)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(animation, is good career)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(animation, is good career option)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animation, is career option)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, is career)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(design, is good career choice)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(design, is career choice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is good career)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(design, is career choice)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(animation, is career)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(design, is good career choice)