animation: is career option

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is career option 1.00
is good career option 0.98
is career choice 0.91
is good career choice 0.90
is career 0.89
is good career 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(design, is career choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animation, is career option)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animation, is career option)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animation, is career option)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, is good career choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animation, is career option)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(design, is career choice)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, is good career choice)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(design, is career)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(design, is good career)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(design, is career choice)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design, is career)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career choice)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(photography, is good career)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(design, is career choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(animation, is career option)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, is good career choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(animation, is career option)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(animation, is career option)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(animation, is career option)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(photography, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(photography, is good career)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(animation, is career option)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(animation, is good career option)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(animation, is good career option)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(animation, is good career option)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career option)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, is career)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animation, is career option)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(design, is good career choice)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(design, is career choice)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is good career)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(design, is career choice)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(design, is good career choice)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(animation, is career option) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career)