animation: is good career

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good career 1.00
is career 0.97
is good career choice 0.93
is good career option 0.91
is career choice 0.90
is career option 0.88
is good job 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(animation, is good career)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(animation, is good career)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(design, is career choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(animation, is good career)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, is good career choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(animation, is good career)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(design, is good career)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(design, is career)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, is good career choice)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(design, is career choice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design, is career)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(design, is career choice)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career choice)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(photography, is good career)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(photography, is good job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(animation, is good career)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(animation, is good career)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, is good career choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(animation, is good career)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(design, is career choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(animation, is good career)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(photography, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(photography, is good career)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(photography, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photography, is good job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(animation, is good career)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, is career)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(animation, is career)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(animation, is career)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(animation, is good career option)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(animation, is good career option)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animation, is career option)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(animation, is good career option)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(animation, is career option)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(animation, is career option)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career option)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is career option)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(animation, is good career)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(design, is good career choice)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(design, is career choice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is good career)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is good job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(design, is good career choice)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(animation, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(design, is career choice)