animation: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality bad 0.87
has quality standard 0.86
has quality compare 0.81
has quality virtue 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(design, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(medium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(design, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(design, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cinema, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(editing, has quality compare)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(design, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(animation, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(animation, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(animation, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(animation, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(medium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(animation, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shrek, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cinema, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cinema, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(shrek, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(editing, has quality compare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(editing, has quality compare)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(animation, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(animation, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(animation, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medium, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(editing, has quality compare)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cinema, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medium, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(animation, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)